KILL means the destruction of entertainment… What is this competition to shed a river of blood on the screen? What do filmmakers want?

Recently watched a movie- KILL. After watching this film produced under Dharma Productions banner, many questions arise in the mind. Is extreme violence now a staple of entertainment? Has the doomsday of entertainment arrived? After all, what do filmmakers want? Why are they killing Manoranjan? Anyway, why the competition in our film industry to portray violence? After watching some of today's popular films, the question deepens as to why the definition of entertainment is changing? When Gil watches, it looks like he's watching Animal's Next Level Danger game. Someone is slaughtered like a goat and someone like a chicken. Trust me, this thrill of dangerous scenes will kill the heart too. But the audience seems to be enjoying it too. Even in theaters, audiences tighten their seat belts when someone punches them in the stomach or stabs them in the chest with a weapon on screen. Blood and screams all over the screen. It seems that the silver screen is thirsty for blood. The thrill of terror is at its peak. However, director Nikhil Nagesh Bhatt has successfully proved his mission in portraying this entertaining horror. Violent with Gandas and Hammers not only Nikhil Bhatt but new actors like Lakshya, Raghav, Tanya have done their job brilliantly. The film is in the news due to his outstanding performance. But the ground prepared for the story, its factual setting, does not seem absurd. A gang of 40 robbers boarded the Rajdhani Express train targeting AC First Class passengers, pulling chains and attacking them. Robbery. Causes anemia. The amazing thing is that they have such weapons that spread the violence we saw in the films of the sixties and seventies. In many films you have seen the bloody knives in the hands of villains like Madan Puri, Ranjeeth or Amjad Khan. In this picture, among these jeans and t-shirt clad dacoits, only a few have handguns while the rest spread violence with sticks and hammers. It is noteworthy that these days, large iron weapons are being used again to depict violence in movies. Vinod Khanna's famous dialogue to a bandit character in Mukhtar Ka Sikandar – First learn to open a knife, then learn to use it. The next moment they beat him to death. This is the era of knife scares in cinema. In the same film, in a fight scene, Amitabh Bachchan and Amjad Khan insert a long iron rod into someone's stomach and bleed out. Time took a long leap and when we got to the animal era, we once again saw Ranbir Kapoor and Bobby Deol slitting each other's throats with huge iron weapons. Again the action of the candle on the gill boils the blood. Meanwhile films like Kaayal, Kadak, Dur, Deevangi were also filled with blood-soaked scenes of violence, but despite this there was a sense of relationship, but in films like Animal and Kill, it was all about blood and not. Human lives were concerned. Although the issue of safety in the train is exposed, Kill is also a very unique film in a way. After emptying the luxury compartment of the Rajdhani train which was running on the tracks for about one and a half hours, a gang of 40 robbers entered. It can happen in some special circumstances, it cannot be denied. But how did the train driver get the information about the disturbing scene in the moving train, where people were bleeding for about an hour and a half, people's necks were cut, stomachs were torn open and weapons were stuck in their chests? , guard, TTE or control room come, there is no provision for this in the train. The question is important, does this film go without saying anything about the railway's shortcomings? Also Read: Science, Fiction or What is the scientific basis of the movie Shikufa Kalki 2898 AD?