IPL 2024: Questions raised again on umpiring, cricket fans angry over Ravindra Jadeja’s no ball

IPL 2024 Ravindra Jadeja no ball controversy: The 39th exciting match of IPL 2024 was played between Chennai Super Kings and Lucknow Super Giants. Lucknow won this high scoring match against Chennai by 6 wickets. Lucknow defeated CSK for the second time this season. Once again fans have raised questions on umpiring in this high voltage match.

Earlier, during the match between KKR and RCB, there was a lot of controversy over the umpire’s decision to give out Virat Kohli. Now fans are furious over Ravindra Jadeja’s no-ball. Fans are now raising questions on empire on social media.

Cricket fans furious over Ravindra Jadeja’s no-ball

Fans have many times raised questions on umpiring in IPL 2024. The matter of Virat Kohli’s dismissal has not cooled down yet, now the controversy has started over Ravindra Jadeja’s no-ball. When Jadeja was bowling against Lucknow Super Giants, Empire gave him a leg no-ball on the last ball of his over.

However, replays showed that part of Jadeja’s shoe was inside the line. According to the rules, if any part of a bowler’s shoe is inside the line then he cannot be given a no-ball.

A user has shared a post on social media and asked a question to the umpire. In this post, the user mentioned the bowling of Jadeja on one side and Sunil Narine on the other side. In which he has been asked how it happened that Jadeja’s ball was a no-ball and Narine’s ball was not a no-ball? Can any rules expert explain this? Now many users are giving their opinion on this post.

Jadeja’s magic did not work against LSG

Ravindra Jadeja’s performance against Lucknow Super Giants was nothing special in both batting and bowling. While batting, Jadeja scored only 16 runs in 19 balls. Apart from this, in this match Jadeja did not take a single wicket by giving 16 runs in just 2 overs. In this way, Jadeja’s magic could not work against LSG.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *