Obscenity video case: Brajwal Revanna was remanded in police custody till June 6 and the SIT arrested him on his return from Germany.

The court ordered suspended JD(S) MP Prajwal Revanna to be remanded in police custody till June 6. Prajwal Revanna, accused in the sexual harassment case, returned to Bengaluru from Germany on Thursday night. The SIT investigated the case and arrested him at night. He was arrested and produced in court on Friday. The court has ordered police custody till June 6. We tell you that a month ago, he fled the country after videos of his alleged activities surfaced in Hassan, Karnataka. The SIT, which is probing these complaints, said that a police team had taken into custody Prajwal Revanna, who had arrived in Bengaluru. After a medical examination on Friday, Prajwal Revanna was produced before the 42nd ACMM court in Bengaluru and remand was sought. Accepting the plea of ​​the SIT, the court ordered the remand of Prajwal Revanna to the custody of the SIT till June 6. SBP Ashok Naik argued on behalf of SIT and Arun Naik argued on behalf of Prajwal. SBP Ashok Naik argued that Revanna was a crooked person on behalf of the SIT. Before the Lok Sabha elections, her obscene video went viral. More than a hundred people have been affected in this case. A few months ago, there was a ban on media coverage. He argued before the judge that he was a pervert and videotaped his obscenities. Responding to the judge's question, SBP Ashok Naik said he left the country after the video went viral. The truth will come out if he is arrested and investigated. There are several victims in this case who are yet to come forward. Many are expatriate in nature. He needs to be interrogated and arrested. Many women are in trouble after this video went viral. The women's husbands look at them with suspicion. SBP Ashok Naik said he filmed the sex scene himself. So he should investigate. Confiscate his mobile phone and get the video from it. Only the mobile phone was recovered from the driver. His phone has a lock system. All this should be investigated. There are also cases of abuse that were not videotaped. Presenting his argument, Ashok Naik said that these should also be investigated. Advocate Arun Naik argued on behalf of Prajwal Revanna. The victim said that she had never reported rape before. The presence of the victim was not recorded in this case. The complaint is four years old. After a report under CrPC 161, a case of rape was registered. The lawyers in this case did not act neutrally. He argued that a bailable case has been converted into a non-bailable case. He said that the rape case has been converted into a rape case. The rule is that it must be video recorded. But the prepared complaint is accepted.. No video was taken of the complainant's statement. They are investigating based on the face of the person seen in the video. It does not require such a long detention. Referring to other cases, Advocate Arun said that custody cannot be granted in this case. Don't know why 15 days police custody? Prajwal is ready to cooperate with the investigation.